| SmartDeblur | |
| The SmartDeblur is a tool for restoration of defocused and blurred images. Written on C++ using Qt 4.8. Algorithm based on several deconvolution technics (Wiener, Tikhonov, Total Variation prior). Supported defect types:
See fftw.org for details. The latest sources and binaries are available on GitHub: https://github.com/Y-Vladimir/SmartDeblur/downloads All source files are under the GPL v3 license. Screenshot of the main window: Main functions:
Detailed description of algorithms and methods you can see at my articles: Restoration of defocused and blurred images (part 1) - theory Restoration of defocused and blurred images (part 2) - practice |
Showing posts with label photography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label photography. Show all posts
Saturday, December 1, 2012
SmartDeblur
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
How To Transfer Prints To Wood
How To Transfer Prints To Wood
- JUNE 19, 2012
If you have a picture that you want to transfer onto wood you have two options, pay for a service to do it, or have a go at it yourself.
Photographer James Brandon shows how to transfer a print onto wood at the leisure of your home, using a laser jet print and a gel medium. (Yes, it has to be laser, inkjent won't cut it for this project).
The results are gorgeous and the entire project is fairly simple.
You can read the entire tutorial on DPS, or watch a video demo after the jump.
Thanks for the heads up, Karen
[How To Transfer Prints To Wood: An Awesome Photography DIY Project on Digital Photography School]
Monday, July 9, 2012
Why I Hate My Camera - Steve Giralt
TOP STORIES
Full size
PHOTOGRAPHY
JUL 9, 2012 5:00 PM 2,496 6 SHARE
GET OUR TOP STORIES
FOLLOW GIZMODO
Why I Hate My Camera
Steve Giralt
Steve Giralt is a pro photographer in NYC. But just because his life revolves around his camera doesn't mean it's a love fest. Here's why he has beef with his photo gear.
Unlike most photographers, I hate my camera. I have read hundreds of stories on the internet where photographers argue about which cameras are the best and why. There are stories trying to prove Canon is better than Nikon, or that 4X5 film is better than medium format digital. Camera review websites show scientific style photographs displaying how much detail they have captured in a dollar bill, or pictures of color checkers and skin tones. They will also show "real-world" and studio tests illustrating how camera A is better than camera B and write long narratives explaining why.
The comments area of the page is where the real battle begins. It's a fight between the skeptics, the cynics, and the undoubting believer. The undoubting believer loves everything he reads about in the article and drools over the amazing new camera. He will defend to the death that this is absolutely the best new camera out there. Then the skeptic throws some punches. The skeptic will pick on a few problems the camera has and will say that under certain circumstances this may be a great camera, but under other conditions it may not be. "This is a great camera for sports, but not for the studio" or something along those lines.
The height of the battle is when the cynic steps into the ring. No matter what the article states, the cynic doesn't believe any of it. One would think that the cynic has a PhD in online camera reviewing. The Cynic goes on to talk about how bad this camera is in comparison to others, how overpriced it is, and how it's worse than its predecessor. The funny thing is that this person has never actually used the new camera. Blow after blow the cynic obsesses over what is wrong about this camera. The cynic will bash the undoubting believer and the skeptic to no avail. They will alternate turns bashing each other until they get completely off topic and start speaking incoherently.
Once the dust settles you realize that none of the comments have added a single ounce of useful information to the review: It's a battle where all the soldiers die and the civilians of the neighboring towns are left watching in bewilderment, wondering what the purpose of the battle was in the first place. The reason why nobody ever wins is because no matter how great a camera may be in the reviews, it will never be perfect. Every camera has advantages and disadvantages in comparison to others and it's likely that no matter what they are, the camera will not make you a better photographer.
No matter how good reviewers say a camera is, I still hate it. The camera is always the one thing which gets in the way of me making the picture I have envisioned or I am witnessing before me. I am in front of an amazing sunset but the image the camera makes often doesn't quite live up to what it was like to be on that beach watching that sunset. Is it even possible to make a picture of an amazing sunset that lives up to the moment? I think so, but most of the time the image just a disappointment.
When I download images from a shoot onto my computer, I sometimes realize that the shot I thought I captured, which embodied the most amazing moment from that shoot, is out of focus or something is just slightly not right. More often than not, the camera gets in the way of the feeling I had when when I pushed that shutter button. For the short time period when the shutter was open and the mirror was up, I am in the dark and can't see with certainty that I captured what I thought I captured until I see the image later. Even if I did capture the moment I was hoping to capture, more often than not the image I shot doesn't quite convey what I felt when I took that picture.
This is why I love photography but hate my camera. It can be frustrating, but I still love the challenge of trying to use a clunky piece of technology to capture images even with the odds stacked up against me. Trying to fit a person, experience, or piece of the world onto the surface of a digital sensor or piece of film is such a challenge. As photographers we take the three dimensional world and turning it into a two dimensional photograph. No matter how good a camera may be, or how good the reviews may be, it is still just a tool which allows me to make photographs. Even a camera with the very best reviews can easily make horrible photographs. I'll tell you one thing for sure, sitting around arguing about why one camera is better than another will not make you a better photographer, but it sure can be entertaining.
Saturday, June 9, 2012
Understanding HDR Photography [Book Review]
As author David Taylor explains: “A digital camera is a low dynamic range device.” And ever since Daguerre captured his first image photographers have laboured to utilise, expand or ignore this limitation … often times to the betterment of the photographic image, many would say.
However it is impossible to argue against HDR when you view images treated with this technique, as displayed in this book, when you want to use photography to record all the information in a scene.
The problem, and this is where HDR excels, is when you are faced with a subject with a dynamic range impossible to capture on the digital sensor. Some resort to using neutral density filters to adjust the tonal range; some just read the exposure from the highlights and let the shadow areas fall away; others go for the shadow areas and let the highlights burn out.
HDR is a technique where you shoot a series of matching shots with varying exposure levels: sometimes three, five or more. These shots are then blended in software and a composite image created that encompasses all the information the originals contained.
Sensibly, one of the early chapters covers the subjects of sensors, wisely advising that small sensors as found in digi compacts are not ideal for HDR work, presenting problems of noise and low bit depth. It’s only when you reach the level of cameras that can capture 12- or 14-bit images that you can begin to enjoy the full benefits of HDR.
Taking a series of matching, but varying exposure, images is in principle a simple practice: the main thing is that neither the camera nor the subject should move during the series of exposures.
Taylor goes on to describe the basics, recommending that the exposures vary in shutter speed not lens aperture, due to variations in depth with the latter.
He also suggest using the RAW file format for the capture, as this contains all the original data of the image, unlike the compression and reduced detail of a JPEG image.
Suggestions are made as to suitable software for the task: Photoshop is one, Photomatix Pro is another, plus the Exposure Fusion option for Lightroom.
Choice of camera, lenses, filters, software and hardware are discussed, as is the important subject of tripods and heads to support the camera firmly during the matching exposures.
I was surprised to find the book suggests that even a single RAW image can be used to work in HDR: the method suggests you create a series of TIFF files with varying exposures; these can be loaded into the appropriate software and a resulting full tonal range image created.
If HDR interests you, there is arguably no better book on the market to get you started. This series of books is an in ideal ‘carrier’ of information on specific subjects and the information within them is tightly packed but easily accessible and pocketable, thanks to the 18x15cm size.
Author: D Taylor. Publisher: Ammonite Press. DLength: 192 pagesISBN: 978 1 90770 854 1. Price: Get a price on HDR Photography (The Expanded Guide: Techniques)
Read more: http://digital-photography-school.com/understanding-hdr-photography-book-review#ixzz1xJNmjeXr
Depth of Field Test
The first part tests your knowledge of the basic principles of depth-of-field while the second part tests your ability to accurately guess the amount of depth-of-field with a real-world situation.This test is divided into two parts.
Best of luck!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)